With foundational documents and video evidence, Ponguleti recently refuted the allegations made by BRS (Bihar Rashtriya Sabha) and BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) in the disputed case known as 22‑A. The case primarily concerns a government land allocation, in which over the past few months both parties claimed that Ponguleti had engaged in irregularities and corruption in the process. Ponguleti responded by making official records, land registers, and relevant departmental orders public, stating that all procedures were carried out according to regulations and no irregularities occurred. Additionally, he presented a detailed video that clearly showed the land transfer process, the consent of the concerned officials, and the dialogue with the local population.
Ponguleti’s response has sparked extensive discussion among political commentators and social activists. Many analysts believe that presenting such evidence not only strengthens individual political immunity but also raises demands for transparency in public administration. On the other hand, BRS and BJP have not yet formally accepted this new information and have called for further investigation. Meanwhile, the local administration has said it will conduct an independent examination of all available documents and evidence to ensure an impartial decision. This step is being regarded as an important move to reduce the ongoing political tension in the state and to restore public confidence.
